Otsego 2000 views our environment as highly interconnected and interactive; agriculture, economics, land-use planning, town planning, and historic or cultural preservation all contribute to the quality of where we live and are critical to ensuring the health of Otsego County.

While we believe growth and change are both desirable and inevitable, our task is to try to guide proposed changes and additions along what we hope are more intelligent pathways. While Otsego Lake is the centerpiece, we are just as concerned with its surroundings, natural and human. All are inseparable. Otsego 2000’s environmental stewardship work focuses on protecting the Otsego region’s rural and agricultural landscapes from harmful development, rural sprawl, and large-scale industrialization that would negatively affect air, water, and soil quality, as well as disrupt our rural character and quality of life.

Development and Infrastructure Projects Affecting Otsego County

A municipality’s comprehensive plans and land use regulations are essential to ensuring that our communities’ development reflects the desires of those who live and work in the towns. Nearly every town and village in Otsego County have comprehensive plans that informed the development of their zoning and subdivision regulations, and without civic engagement by the citizens of each town to ensure development occurs in accordance with those plans, we stand to lose our community character and in the process, could irretrievably harm our environment.

Manocherian Subdivision Proposal, Towns of Springfield and Otsego

  • 1,525 acres of farmland, open space, steep slopes and wetlands on the west side of Otsego Lake

  • 111 4.5 acre - 60 acres buildable lots to be created through a major subdivision

  • Town of Otsego—765 acres subdivided into 59 buildable lots; 1.9 miles new road

  • Town of Springfield—760 acres subdivided into 52 buildable lots; 1.1 miles new road

This project would potentially affect Otsego Lake water quality, State Route 80, the Glimmerglass Historic District, SUNY Biological Field Station’s Thayer Farm campus, as well as Vibbard, Wedderspoon Hollow, McCrorie, Red House Hill and Thurston Hill Roads.

The property owners’ representatives presented the project in a sketch plan conference to the Otsego and Springfield Town Planning Boards in August 2025, and will return at some point in the coming months with a formal application and plats to each town planning board.

To receive updates and reminders on town meetings, send us your email.

Be Informed.

Community Meeting on September 7
Have questions or concerns about the proposed major subdivision? All welcome to a Community Meeting on Sunday, September 7 at 3 pm at the Pierstown Grange, 137 Wedderspoon Hollow Road, Cooperstown. Leadership from the Otsego County Conservation Association, Otsego 2000, the Otsego Land Trust and SUNY Oneonta Biological Field Station will be hand to share information on the roles their organizations play in protecting the Otsego Lake region and to answer questions.

Town Meeting Schedule

Town of Otsego Planning Board meets the 1st Tuesday of the month at 7:30 PM

Town of Otsego Board meets the 2nd Wednesday of the month at 7 PM

Town of Springfield Planning Board meets the 1st Thursday of the month at 7 PM

Town of Springfield Board meets the 2nd Monday of the month at 7 PM

 EcoYotta, Inc. Data Center in Residential Agricultural District 40

The founders of EcoYotta, Inc., a brand-new startup, purchased a 150-acre horse farm in the Town of Oneonta’s RA-40 zoning district two years ago. They have petitioned the Town to change the zoning for the parcel to allow data centers and research centers. If allowed, this zoning amendment would certainly and negatively affect the neighborhood, which is primarily rural homes and farms. After public outcry, EcoYotta withdrew its application but plans to return at a later date.

Rezoning of The Farmhouse Restaurant to Allow Gas Station
and Convenience Store

The Farmhouse Restaurant has been shuttered for years, and the current owner of the parcel has submitted an application to rezone the parcel on the north side of Route 7 from R-10 Residential to B-2 Business which would allow non-residential development to include gas stations, car lots, commercial garages, among others. This is concerning because the lot is bordered by Gifford Creek, a class C stream that feeds into the Susquehanna River and the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The current owner seeks this zoning change to build a gas station/convenience store targeting I-88 and Route 7 traffic. It would be an outlier parcel in the R-10 district, which would surround it. Recommended distance for gas stations and underground fuel storage tanks from water sources is between 300
and 500 ft.

The above examples illustrate how critical a municipality’s comprehensive plans and land use regulations are to ensuring that their communities’ development reflects the desires of those who live and work in the towns. The towns of Oneonta, Otsego and Springfield each have comprehensive plans that informed the development of their zoning regulations, and without civic engagement by the citizens of each town, we stand to lose the community character and irretrievably harm our environment.
To receive updates and reminders on Oneonta City and Town meetings send us your email.
Be Informed.

The City of Oneonta Common Council meets the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 pm.

The City of Oneonta Planning Commission meets the third Wednesday of each month, at 7:00 p.m., in the Common Council Chambers.

The Town of Oneonta Planning Board meets the 1st & 3rd Monday of every month at 7:00 pm.

  • Event Materials and Q&A from October 16 program at the Village Library of Cooperstown

  • We call for energy conservation to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. We strongly support solar energy development that is compatible with our agricultural resources and environment.

    OTSEGO 2000 POSITION ON SOLAR AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
    Adopted February 24, 2018

    Otsego 2000 is a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the historic, environmental, cultural, and agricultural resources of Otsego County and the greater Otsego Lake region. We support and offer informed advocacy, intelligent planning, public education, and sustainable economic alternatives, all in service of the long-term economic well-being and the quality of life of our residents.

    Climate change, driven in large part by fossil fuel use, is a significant threat to our region and way of life. We call for and support energy conservation and efficiency to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and the necessity for expanded fossil fuel infrastructure and delivery systems. In addition, we call for and support smart development of renewable energy sources to meet the goals adopted by New York State for greenhouse gas reductions.

    We strongly support solar energy development compatible with our agricultural resources and environment, including community solar facilities for local benefit. We encourage commercial, residential, and agricultural property owners to shift to rooftop or freestanding solar arrays to reduce or eliminate fossil fuel use. We encourage eligible property owners to take advantage of financial incentives such as those offered by the New York State Energy Research Authority (NYSERDA) and applicable historic preservation tax credits in connection with such installations.

    To this end, we support development of solar installations that:

    Prioritize previously disturbed or degraded areas, such as landfills, brownfields, impervious surfaces.

    Protect agricultural lands and offer co-location of agriculture with solar power installations.

    Protect our historic, cultural, and scenic resources.

    Maintain conserved lands, whether for ecological or agricultural purposes.

    We also support residential, commercial and community development of geothermal, wind and other renewable energy sources, guided by similar considerations.

  • In 2008, Otsego 2000 began a long campaign to educate state and local leaders and citizens about the adverse and irreversible impacts of natural gas hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Among the first statewide to raise the alarm, we felt strongly that the draft New York DEC guidelines governing shale gas extraction in Otsego County, and elsewhere in New York, posed unacceptable risks to our water, environment, agriculture, health and infrastructure. They failed to safeguard our drinking water supplies and air quality, did not take into account considerable seismic activity, did not protect the fragile historic heritage of our communities, and did not provide the means for local and county governments to protect existing infrastructure from the onslaught of heavy truck traffic, the upgrade of emergency response training, or the effective treatment and disposal of fracking wastewater. Most alarmingly, there had been no comprehensive study of the cumulative impacts of shale gas extraction either on the environment or on human and animal health. Until such data are available, and until shale gas extraction can be proven harmless to the climate, environment and human and animal health, Otsego 2000 supports a ban on hydraulic fracturing and related activity – waste disposal/storage, transport, etc. -- in New York State.

    To this end, Otsego 2000 led the State in organizing communities to enact bans on heavy industry, including shale gas extraction, and push the State for stringent regulations, organizing neighborhood groups and supporting Home Rule -- the right of local communities to determine their community character through control over land-use decisions. Most recently, for example, Otsego 2000 established the Middlefield Legal Defense Fund to hold monies that were contributed to assist the Town of Middlefield in its lawsuit, Cooperstown Holstein vs. Town of Middlefield. That lawsuit ended with a ruling by the New York State Court of Appeals, in June 2014, upholding the town’s right of Home Rule. Subsequently, over 100 towns and villages in New York have banned fracking. Otsego 2000 also pioneered the highly successful comment letter template system which enabled ordinary concerned citizens to voice their concerns quickly and efficiently during often tight public comment periods. Working with local experts, 20 different comment letters were drafted for people to adapt and send. This system, also adopted by New Yorkers Against Fracking, Catskill Mountain Keeper and other organizations, led to an exponential rise in the number of public comments received, from 1,000 on the first draft SGEIS to over 200,000 on the revised draft SGEIS. It also was a highly effective educational tool as the details in the draft letters were circulated to a wide audience. At the same time, organizing such an overwhelming response to the draft SGEIS bought time for the ongoing environmental and health impact studies in other states to begin to show results.

    On December 17, 2014, the State announced that a ban would be instituted based on the emerging science and impacts in states where fracking was permitted. In June 2015, in a Findings Statement on high-volume hydrofracking (HVHF), the NYS DEC announced that it had found no feasible or prudent alternatives that would adequately avoid or minimize adverse environmental impacts, and that would address the scientific uncertainties and risks to public health from this activity. To that end, the NYS DEC recommended a “No-Action alternative,” prohibiting HVHF in New York State. The statement noted the challenges in protecting special places, such as Otsego County's nearly 35,000 acres of National Register or National Register-eligible historic districts, from negative impacts associated with fracking. Despite these significant achievements, Otsego 2000’s campaign against this method of shale gas extraction and the transport pipelines and compressor stations that may crisscross the state will continue until a safe alternative is discovered.